Essay inspired by Agatha Christie's Poirot

Honestly I didn't expected any good impression from this film at first. But it did was interesting to watch.

First of all I fancy the character of David Suchet (Poirot) very much. He is a very refined and funny person at the moments. But what about Pilar, I expected her to look more yang.

After that, there are a couple of cardinal differences between the Agatha Christie's book and the film's plot. We didn't see Stephan Farr in the screen version of the book. Next point is that Hercule Poirot was invited to Simeon Lee's house with the other guests.

Nevertheless, I thing that the movie was filmed very well. The most exciting moment for me was the case, when Pilar was attacked by unknown person. It happened completely unexpectedly and brought a new riddle into the plot.

The issue of the story was sudden for me. I mean that, I haven't thought Poirot to solve the case with such a little number of ambiguous facts. But he excellently succeeded in investigating such a sophisticated case! Bravo Poirot!

The main idea as it seem for me could be expressed in the next statement: "The care of nothings isn't a nothing at all!"